To whom it may concern,
Greetings on this glorious day that the Lord has made! I hope that you and the loved ones are in good health. How is your spirit on this glorious day? Please remember that we humans are more than flesh and blood. Some scientists don't believe in the Lord, the Holy One of Israel, our Creator Lord, our Messiah and King. Some scientists do believe, and put their hope in Jesus! The bad angels, the demons, believe in Messiah Jesus, and they shudder!!! Who is the Word of God? Jesus is the Word of God!!!
Psalm 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 53:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniquity; there is none that doeth good.
Why should we believe in scientists, that don't believe in God, when they say there is no God? Why should we believe in scientists today, that don't believe in the Creator Lord, that teach differently than scientists from 85 - 95 years ago? Why should we believe in scientists, that don't believe in our Messiah and King, that would say that all that have walked the earth had evolved from a lower life form (including our Messiah, angels - both good and bad, and believers and non-believers alike)? How many scientists teach that we humans have a distinct DNA, from the moment of fertilization until death, than any other life form?
John 1:1-3 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by Him; and without Him was not anything made that was made.
John 1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made by Him, and the world knew Him not.
John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Whom should we believe? Believe on the Holy One of Israel! Should we believe everything that scientists (that don't believe in the Lord - or any scientist for that matter) say? No! Please remember that we humans are created by our Creator Lord, in His image, for HIS glory! Our Creator Lord is faithful! Our Creator Lord is true! Our Creator Lord cannot lie! Our Creator Lord can be taken at HIS Word! Jesus is the Word of God! Our Creator Lord is good! Our Creator Lord is good all the time!!! Our Creator Lord is LOVE.
Jesus is the same today, yesterday, and forever!
Jesus is Lord!!! Jesus is our Rock!!! Jesus is our Redeemer!!! Jesus is our Righteousness!!!
God is love. God is LOVE.
The Lord is our Strength!!!
The Scriptures were given to the Jew first and then the Gentiles.
Jesus is the Holy One of Israel! Jesus is the Living Water!!! Jesus is the Bread of Life!
All glory, honor, praise, and thanks be to our Creator Lord - maker of heaven and earth, King of kings, and Lord of lords - Messiah and King!!!!
How about justice for the unborn children - the preborn children??? Let's seek justice for the unborn children - the preborn children!!!!!
8/25/14
Did the Messiah, the Holy One of
Israel, evolve from a lower life form??? Did Moses evolve from a lower
life form? Did Abraham evolve from a lower life form? Did Jacob
(Israel) evolve from a lower life form? Did Samson evolve from a lower
life form? Did King David evolve from a lower life form? Did the
virgin Mary evolve from a lower life form???
Ask
an evolutionist if whether he believes that all those (beings) that have walked
the earth (past and present) had evolved from a lower life form (did the
Messiah [Jesus] evolve from a lower life form??? No way - He was full of
grace and truth - the Word made flesh, the Light of the World, our Rock, our
Shield, our Fortress, our Redeemer, our Salvation, our Atonement!!!). Did
the virgin Mary evolve from a lower life form?
Of angels, miracles, and bad angels (demons): There are some people among us who don't believe in the
supernatural, only the natural. What these people miss is self-evident. Not all
beings on earth, however, are human - some are angels. You have evolutionists
who believe that a Creator didn't create the universe, or perform miracles -
again, ask an evolutionist whether the Messiah did indeed perform miracles, or
when miracles occurred throughout history (Moses and the parting of the sea,
and the ten commandments, and the ten plagues, and Samson, and Gideon, and
many more!) - what were the cause of them? They will not be able to answer how
angels (both good and bad) "evolved". They will not be able to answer
how the Messiah "evolved" (or why the Messiah came to earth). They
will not be able to answer how the head of the demons (Satan, or the Devil)
"evolved". They will not answer how the miracles, that have taken
place, that our Creator Lord have done, did take place. Those people who do not
believe in the supernatural have not seen what is self-evident. They do not
realize that angels (both good and bad) are among us. [It is interesting to
note that even the demons believe in the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (the
Great I AM) - and the demons shudder]. We should pray that the good
Lord, our Creator Lord, opens the eyes of the people who do not see, that they
should see. We not only have to battle the sin within us, and not be corrupted
(polluted) by the world, but also to resist the Devil and his angels. Of
course, the Messiah did not "evolve", nor did the angels (good and
bad), and neither did the head of the bad angels "evolve". The
Messiah did come to earth for a reason. I have worked along side of
angels, and have lived along side of angels (some good and some bad). The
Messiah came to the earth, from above, to shed His blood for us sinners, so
that we might have eternal life.
For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that
whosoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have everlasting life
(John 3:16).
We love, because He first loved us. (1John 4:19)
Love does no harm to his neighbor, therefore, love is the fulfilling of the Law.
Jesus is the Holy One of Israel!!!
Please
remember that we humans are created by our Creator Lord, in His image, with
inalienable rights!
Please
remember that we humans are more than flesh and blood.
All glory, honor, praise, and thanks be to our Creator Lord - maker of heaven and earth - Messiah and King!!!!!
How
about justice for the unborn children??? Let's seek justice for the
unborn children - the preborn children!!!!!
Please check out an article in the afaJournal, April 2014 edition, pg. 22 - 23 (www.afajournal.org)
Creation?
Nye says nay ...Ham credits 'I AM'
by Teddy James
For Ken Ham, founder of Answers in Genesis and the Creation Museum, the
much-anticipated debate with the noted scientist Bill Nye "The Science
Guy" began long before the two stood in front of a sold out audience and
millions of online viewers. Ham hosted a meeting with members of the
press 60 minutes before the debate. Reporters took the opportunity to
question him about creation science and his motives behind the timing of the
debate.
"Some have said it's not coincidental that this debate comes as you are
seeing funding deadlines for your Ark Park project," one reporter said.
"How do you answer all the dating tests that show rocks and trees are
older than your purported age of the earth," another pressed.
Ham answered each question with humility and candor, even getting many of those
present to laugh by saying that they were making him let the cat out of the bag
before the main event.
Clash
of Ideas
When both scientists made it to the Creation Museum stage in Petersburg,
Kentucky, moderator Tom Foreman explained the central question for
discussion: "Is creation a viable model of origins in today's modern
scientific era?" He then described the debate's format. Each
man would have 5 minutes for opening remarks, 30 minutes to present his
beliefs, 5 minutes for rebuttal, another 5 minutes for a counter rebuttal, then
45 minutes of answering questions from the audience.
During his opening remarks, Ham drew a distinction between observational or
operational science and historical science. Observational science is what
scientists use to experiment, innovate, invent and build. Historical science,
in Ham's view, is what scientists do to understand what happened in the
past. His assertion was that scientists have many assumptions about the
past, and if those assumptions are founded in evolution, then the assumptions
and thus the conclusions, are unreliable and wrong.
There appeared to be mutual respect between the debaters with Nye even thanking
Ham after his 30 minute presentation saying, "i really learned
something." However, his gracious attitude abruptly disappeared.
Nye quickly made a distinction between scientists who follow Ham's dichotomy of
the sciences and those who do not. He said, "There is no distinction
made between historical science and observational science. Those are constructs
unique to Mr. Ham." He proceeded with frequent references to
mainstream scientists, "outside" the Creation Museum, and therefore
outside Ham's belief system.
Nye later exemplified his view of the Bible saying, "I understand that you
take the Bible, as written in English, translated many, many times over the
last three millennia to be a more accurate, more reasonable assessment of the
natural laws we see around us than what I and everybody in here can
observe. That to me, is unsettling."
Clash
of worldviews
His unsettling is easy to explain. The debate centered on evolution
versus creation on its surface, but at its core, it was a clash of
worldviews. Ham bases his worldview and his view of origins on the
Bible. Nye bases his worldview and his view of the origins on the
material world and evidence he can see and touch. Consequently, the two
have little room for agreement.
Ham believes the earth is 6,000 years old. He said, "Creation is the
only viable model of historical science confirmed by observational science in
today's modern scientific era." He later asserted that observational
science must logically borrow from a creationist worldview in order to make
discoveries and innovations.
This was followed by a question asking Ham whether he interprets the Bible
literally. "I interpret the Bible naturally," he
answered. "If a passage is written as historical narrative, as
Genesis is, you take it as history. If it's poetry, as we find in the
Psalms, you take it as poetry."
Nye responded: "It sounds to me that there (are) certain parts of this
document, of the Bible, that you embrace literally and other parts you consider
poetry. So it sounds to me like you're going to take what you like and
interpret it literally and other passages you're going to interpret as poetic
or descriptions of human events. All that aside, I'll just say
scientifically, or as a reasonable man, it doesn't seem possible that when all
these things that contradict your literal interpretation of those first few
passages, all those things contradict that, I find that unsettling."
Nye insisted that creationism is not only wrong but also backward.
"What keeps the United States ahead, what makes the United States a world
leader is our technology," he said. "If we continue to eschew
science, and try to divide science between observational science and historical
science, we are going to move forward. We will not embrace natural
laws. We will not make discoveries. We will not invent."
Clash
of beliefs
It was the belief in the "danger" of creationism that initially
brought Nye to Kentucky. In his closing remarks, he said, "I want to
close by reminding everybody what's at stake here. If we abandon all that
we learned ... if we abandon the process by which we know it ... if we stop
looking for the next answer, we in the United States will be out-competed by
other countries, other economies. That would be okay, I guess, but I was
born here, I'm a patriot, and so we have to embrace science education. We
have to keep science education in science classes."
Post-debate, much of the media seemed to agree with Nye. In Ham's native
Australia, Brisbane Times apologized to Kentucky with acerbic mockery:
"Well this is embarrassing ... I'm sorry Kentucky. We could have
kept (Ham) here, you know. We have a large containment facility where we
store all of our Ken Hams. ... I'm not sure how Ham got out of the Queensland
high school system where [he] has been teaching - ahem - science, and made his
way to your fair shores."
Other news sources and websites joined in the ridicule of Ham, his beliefs
about the authority of Scripture, and anyone who shares his views.
However the criticism failed to discourage Ham. In a post-debate interview
on the Answers in Genesis YouTube channel, he declared the winner of the debate
to be God's Word, which he invoked numerous times. In at least three of
those mentions, the estimated five million people who watched the debate live
on the Internet heard Ham clearly identify Jesus Christ as Savior of mankind.
And that good news is not debatable.
end
of story ...... (or is it?)
The Holy Scriptures tell us about our Creator Lord, and how we
humans are created by our Creator Lord, in His image, and how we should value
life, and how we should protect and support life, and how the good Lord, our
Creator Lord loves us tat he sent His only begotten Son Jesus into this world
to shed His blood and to die on the cross for us sinners, so that we might have
eternal life. The Holy Scriptures are pure, perfect, powerful, profitable
for doctrine and teaching, and cannot be broken!
The
Good News:
The
good Lord, our Creator Lord, loves us that He sent his only Begotten Son Jesus
into this world to shed His blood and to die on a cross for us sinners, so that we might
have eternal life!
No comments:
Post a Comment