Why aren't living wills working well? An interesting article from Terri Schiavo Life and Hope Network (see www.lifeandhope.com)

A Nurse's Perspective on Life, Healthcare and Ethics About Nancy Valko, RN ALNC abortion assisted suicide bereavement brain injury conscience rights disability euthanasia faith family planning grief medical ethics marriage nursing organ donation palliative care prenatal testing HomeWhy “Living Wills” Are Not Working Well Why “Living Wills” Are Not Working Well October 20, 2021 nancyvalko advance directives, Compassion & Choices, end-of-life, Living wills, medical ethics In a stunning October 8, 2021 article titled “What’s Wrong With Advance Care Planning?“ in the prestigious Journal of the American Medical Association, three prominent supporters of “living wills” and other advance care documents admit that after 30 years of the promotion of such advance care plan (ACP) documents: “The assumption that ACP will result in goal-concordant end-of-life care led to widespread public initiatives promoting its use, physician reimbursement for ACP discussions, and use as a quality measure by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, commercial payers, and others. However, the scientific data do not support this assumption. ” (Emphasis added) Drs. R. Sean Morrison, Diane E Meier, and Robert M. Arnold are prominent doctors and ethicists at prestigious institutions who have long promoted the advance care documents that are asked about when people enter hospitals, nursing homes, long care facilities, etc. I have been writing about such documents and their uses and hazards for decades. ACPs were promoted as essential to document a person’s healthcare wishes like Do Not Resuscitate orders and forgoing interventions like feeding tubes and ventilators in the event that the person is unable to speak for himself or herself. Many such documents also designate a trusted friend or relative to assist in the potential future decision-making process. All adults have been encouraged to make such documents regardless of their health status because it was assumed that such ACPs would lead to higher quality care at the end of life. But, as the authors now admit: “The inability of ACP to achieve its desired outcomes represents the gap between hypothetical scenarios and the decision-making process in clinical practice settings.” (Emphasis added) After 52 years of experience working in ICUs, oncology (cancer), dialysis, hospice and home health as well as caring for relatives and friends, I wholeheartedly agree with the authors that: “Treatment choices near the end of life are not simple, consistent, logical, linear, or predictable but are complex, uncertain, emotionally laden, and fluid. Patients’ preferences are rarely static and are influenced by age, physical and cognitive function, culture, family preferences, clinician advice, financial resources, and perceived caregiver burden (eg, need to provide personal care, time off from work, emotional strain, out-of-pocket or noncovered medical costs), which change over time.” (Emphasis added) WHAT DOES WORK? The authors point to the patient having a trusted person in advance to act as a surrogate decisionmaker and improving the communication with healthcare providers in real time. They also point to: “training clinicians and preparing patients and families to engage in high-quality discussions when actual (not hypothetical) medical decisions must be made is needed to achieve the outcomes that ACP has not.” (Emphasis added) However, pitfalls still remain. Patients and their decisionmakers do need accurate information about their conditions and potential treatments. However, as I found as a nurse, patients and their surrogate decisionmakers often have negative preconceptions (often reinforced in the media) about treatments such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ventilators, feeding tubes, etc. Unfortunately in hospital situations, the advance care plans with the common DNR (do not resuscitate) directive are sometimes misinterpreted as not wanting to live or “do not treat” when the person had assumed it would apply only in extreme circumstances. And some healthcare institutions have medical futility policies that allow doctors to overrule the person’s decisionmaker. In addition, we have well-funded organizations like Compassion and Choices that not only work to get assisted suicide laws passed in every state but also promote their own advance directive to allow the lethal “healthcare option” of VSED (voluntary stopping of food and water) to ensure death. Particularly in the frail elderly, it can be difficult to determine whether or not a person is truly dying. And while we are never required to accept treatment that is medically futile or excessively burdensome to us, sometimes this can be hard to determine. Far too many times, feeding tubes and other interventions are automatically assumed to be futile and/or burdensome. But there is another alternative that is often ignored: trying an intervention with the option of stopping it if it truly is futile or burdensome. There are no guarantees in life or death but even finding out that something doesn’t work can be a step forward and can relieve any guilt in the surviving relatives. CONCLUSION I was surprised but very pleased to read that the three prominent doctors writing the article “What’s Wrong With Advance Care Planning?” after years of promoting “living wills” and other end of life documents. But, in the end, the real answer is a return to the traditional medical ethics of “First, do no harm”, a presumption for life and excellent, unbiased information. That is why my husband and I made our own healthcare directives to require full information about all options, risks and benefits before making medical decisions. And, most importantly, that we believe that “quality of life” is something to be improved, not judged. Share this: TwitterFacebook Related LIVING WITH “LIVING WILLS” November 22, 2015 In "advance directives" Nurses, “Living Wills” and Healthcare Economic$ January 26, 2018 In "economics" Covid 19 and the Culture of Death May 20, 2020 In "advance directives" Post navigation My 2000 Voices Magazine Article: Who Wants a “Defective” Baby? Leave a Reply This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Search for: Recent Posts Why “Living Wills” Are Not Working Well My 2000 Voices Magazine Article: Who Wants a “Defective” Baby? What You Should Know about the New Federal Covid 19 Vaccine Mandate The Powerful Effect of the US Supreme Court’s Decision Refusing to Block the Texas Heartbeat Act An Unexpected Recovery and What We Can Learn from It Recent Comments My 2000 Voices Magaz… on The Powerful Effect of the US… An Unexpected Recove… on An Unexpected Recovery and Wha… Continúa el suicidio… on The Assisted Suicide Juggernau… Correction to… on How Missouri Became the First… How Missouri became… on How Missouri Became the First… Archives October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 Catergories Register Log in Entries feed Comments feed WordPress.com Follow Blog via Email Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Email Address: Categories abortion about me adoption advance directives aging Alzheimer's AMA ANA assisted suicide bereavement brain death brain injury Canada Cancer CHA civil rights Compassion & Choices conception conscience rights Covid 19 CPR culture dementia disability drug addiction Drugs economics education end-of-life euthanasia faith family family planning fetal tissue food and water futility grief health care reform hospice Kevorkian law Living wills marriage media medical medical ethics mental health miscarriage nursing organ donation palliative care Planned Parenthood prenatal testing pro-life sex ed Simon's Law suicide terminal/palliative sedation terninal/palliative sedation Uncategorized vaccines ventilators/life support Categories abortion about me adoption advance directives aging Alzheimer's AMA ANA assisted suicide bereavement brain death brain injury Canada Cancer CHA civil rights Compassion & Choices conception conscience rights Covid 19 CPR culture dementia disability drug addiction Drugs economics education end-of-life euthanasia faith family family planning fetal tissue food and water futility grief health care reform hospice Kevorkian law Living wills marriage media medical medical ethics mental health miscarriage nursing organ donation palliative care Planned Parenthood prenatal testing pro-life sex ed Simon's Law suicide terminal/palliative sedation terninal/palliative sedation Uncategorized vaccines ventilators/life support Blog at WordPress.com. :)