Operational Space Ships by 2036 - the LORD willing!!!

Operational Space Ships by 2036 - the LORD willing Year Ships with crew and passengers Cargo ships Launch Pads 2025 4 1 5 2026 5 2 5 2027 6 2 6 2028 8 3 7 2029 10 4 7 2030 12 5 8 2031 18 6 9 2032 28 8 11 2033 29 9 12 2034 32 10 13 2035 33 11 15 2036 34 12 17 Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

What would be accomplished at a moon station???

Moon Station 2032 - the LORD willing What would a moon station have and what would happen there? Probably it would be manned by scientists and engineers and others. Could it also be a place for people to visit? The moon station could include, but not be limited to: Research modules w/ 3D printers, computers sinks, tables, and other items - 5 Living Quarters for the scientists and engineers - 49 Dining Quarters - 30 Bathrooms 7 Lounging Quarters 40 Supply rooms Gym 25 Visiting Section to include: Museum and library Living Sections up to 235 people w/ bathroom Dining Quarters to hold up to 78 people (3 total) with 6 stoves, and 4 microwaves Bathrooms 14 Lounging areas 6 total (hold up to 40 people/area) Football/soccer fields (2 football fields and 3 soccer fields) Ice Hockey Rinks 2 Basketball Courts 7 Workout Gyms 4 total to include up to 25 people Racquetball Courts 6 Pickel Courts 6 Solar energy source to produce 325 kwhr/hr. Unoccupied Launch pads 7 Moon Vehicles 2 busses, 3 minivans, 4 vehicles to hold 5 + driver Garage/Shop Water Tower to hold 6 - 7 days supply of water Back up generators to produce 200 kwhr/hr. Maintenance/Assistants living Quarters to hold 19 people Water Treatment Station Recycling/Garbage Compacting Station

Moon Station by 2032 - the LORD willing!!!!

Moon Station 2032 - the LORD willing What would a moon station have and what would happen there? Probably it would be manned by scientists and engineers and others. Could it also be a place for people to visit? The moon station could include, but not be limited to: Research modules w/ 3D printers, computers sinks, tables, and other items - 5 Living Quarters for the scientists and engineers - 49 Dining Quarters - 30 Bathrooms 7 Lounging Quarters 40 Supply rooms Gym 25 Visiting Section to include: Museum and library Living Sections up to 235 people w/ bathroom Dining Quarters to hold up to 78 people (3 total) with 6 stoves, and 4 microwaves Bathrooms 14 Lounging areas 6 total (hold up to 40 people/area) Football/soccer fields (2 football fields and 3 soccer fields) Ice Hockey Rinks 2 Basketball Courts 7 Workout Gyms 4 total to include up to 25 people Racquetball Courts 6 Pickel Courts 6 Solar energy source to produce 325 kwhr/hr. Unoccupied Launch pads 7 Moon Vehicles 2 busses, 3 minivans, 4 vehicles to hold 5 + driver Garage/Shop Water Tower to hold 6 - 7 days supply of water Back up generators to produce 200 kwhr/hr. Maintenance/Assistants living Quarters to hold 19 people Water Treatment Station Recycling/Garbage Compacting Station

A manned mission to Mars????

Manned Mission to Mars - the LORD willing! Things to be done prior to the main mission flight ( to travel to Mars with astronauts and to land some of the astronauts on Mars and then have all the astronauts safely to earth). Build and occupy and start doing research in a moon station by 2032. Create a group of 38 (G38) and start having important discussions and meetings. Create a group of 55 (G55) shortly thereafter creating a group of 38 andd start having important discussions and meetings. It is from this group of 55 that 75 - 80 astronauts will come from and trained for the mission. Also, from this group of 55 eleven (11) launch sites will be sewlected or if need be built, with the needed communications and lauch site capabilities. The group of 55 nations' engineers and scientists and the 75 - 80 astronauts will help in the planning and building of the overall missions. Multiple Mars landers that would hold 4 people and be capable of taking off from the main spaceships and landing on Mars and then later returning to the spaceshops will need to be designed and built and tested pror to the amoin mission flight. Two orbiting satelites to Mars (unmanned) prior to the main missionn launch. Each of the two satelites separates 9nto 2 satelites, each with its own communication system (7 communication channels on each satelite) and will communicate with each other, the earth, and also to the main mission space ships. Two unmanned space ships with supplies will be successfully landed on Mars prior to the main mission *the location of the launch of the satelites and supply ships will be determnined by the group[ of 55 and the astronauts. Twenty-four (24) astronauts of the trained astronauts will be selected and will go to moon prior to the main Mars mission (which would have been previously occupied by research scientists and engineers by 2032). Days prior to the amin mission flight, the final eighteen (18) astronauts that will be aboard the main mission be selected. Four manned spaceships will be launched within minutes of each other along with four additional supply ships (the order of the space ships to be determined by the group of 55 nations and the 75 - 80 astronauts. While orbiting Mars, the main mission will be instructed as to which will be on the Mars lander within the space ship and to land on Mars. The details of what the astronauts wiull do on Mars will have been determined by the group of 55 nations and the 75 - 80 astronauts. Also, the reloading of supplies for the return trip will be determined by the group of 55 nations and the 75 - 80 astronauts and whether they would come back directly to earth or land back on the moon. That iis also one of the reasons to have eleven (11) launch pads available prior to the main mission (also the eleven sites could be used for other space exploration missions prior to the Mars mission. Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Please, please help get a manned mission to the Mars!!!!

Manned Mission to Mars - the LORD willing! Things to be done prior to the main mission flight ( to travel to Mars with astronauts and to land some of the astronauts on Mars and then have all the astronauts safely to earth). Build and occupy and start doing research in a moon station by 2032. Create a group of 38 (G38) and start having important discussions and meetings. Create a group of 55 (G55) shortly thereafter creating a group of 38 andd start having important discussions and meetings. It is from this group of 55 that 75 - 80 astronauts will come from and trained for the mission. Also, from this group of 55 eleven (11) launch sites will be sewlected or if need be built, with the needed communications and lauch site capabilities. The group of 55 nations' engineers and scientists and the 75 - 80 astronauts will help in the planning and building of the overall missions. Multiple Mars landers that would hold 4 people and be capable of taking off from the main spaceships and landing on Mars and then later returning to the spaceshops will need to be designed and built and tested pror to the amoin mission flight. Two orbiting satelites to Mars (unmanned) prior to the main missionn launch. Each of the two satelites separates 9nto 2 satelites, each with its own communication system (7 communication channels on each satelite) and will communicate with each other, the earth, and also to the main mission space ships. Two unmanned space ships with supplies will be successfully landed on Mars prior to the main mission *the location of the launch of the satelites and supply ships will be determnined by the group[ of 55 and the astronauts. Twenty-four (24) astronauts of the trained astronauts will be selected and will go to moon prior to the main Mars mission (which would have been previously occupied by research scientists and engineers by 2032). Days prior to the amin mission flight, the final eighteen (18) astronauts that will be aboard the main mission be selected. Four manned spaceships will be launched within minutes of each other along with four additional supply ships (the order of the space ships to be determined by the group of 55 nations and the 75 - 80 astronauts. While orbiting Mars, the main mission will be instructed as to which will be on the Mars lander within the space ship and to land on Mars. The details of what the astronauts wiull do on Mars will have been determined by the group of 55 nations and the 75 - 80 astronauts. Also, the reloading of supplies for the return trip will be determined by the group of 55 nations and the 75 - 80 astronauts and whether they would come back directly to earth or land back on the moon. That iis also one of the reasons to have eleven (11) launch pads available prior to the main mission (also the eleven sites could be used for other space exploration missions prior to the Mars mission. Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Why not have manned mission to Mars and back???

Manned Mission to Mars - the LORD willing! Things to be done prior to the main mission flight ( to travel to Mars with astronauts and to land some of the astronauts on Mars and then have all the astronauts safely to earth). Build and occupy and start doing research in a moon station by 2032. Create a group of 38 (G38) and start having important discussions and meetings. Create a group of 55 (G55) shortly thereafter creating a group of 38 andd start having important discussions and meetings. It is from this group of 55 that 75 - 80 astronauts will come from and trained for the mission. Also, from this group of 55 eleven (11) launch sites will be sewlected or if need be built, with the needed communications and lauch site capabilities. The group of 55 nations' engineers and scientists and the 75 - 80 astronauts will help in the planning and building of the overall missions. Multiple Mars landers that would hold 4 people and be capable of taking off from the main spaceships and landing on Mars and then later returning to the spaceshops will need to be designed and built and tested pror to the amoin mission flight. Two orbiting satelites to Mars (unmanned) prior to the main missionn launch. Each of the two satelites separates 9nto 2 satelites, each with its own communication system (7 communication channels on each satelite) and will communicate with each other, the earth, and also to the main mission space ships. Two unmanned space ships with supplies will be successfully landed on Mars prior to the main mission *the location of the launch of the satelites and supply ships will be determnined by the group[ of 55 and the astronauts. Twenty-four (24) astronauts of the trained astronauts will be selected and will go to moon prior to the main Mars mission (which would have been previously occupied by research scientists and engineers by 2032). Days prior to the amin mission flight, the final eighteen (18) astronauts that will be aboard the main mission be selected. Four manned spaceships will be launched within minutes of each other along with four additional supply ships (the order of the space ships to be determined by the group of 55 nations and the 75 - 80 astronauts. While orbiting Mars, the main mission will be instructed as to which will be on the Mars lander within the space ship and to land on Mars. The details of what the astronauts wiull do on Mars will have been determined by the group of 55 nations and the 75 - 80 astronauts. Also, the reloading of supplies for the return trip will be determined by the group of 55 nations and the 75 - 80 astronauts and whether they would come back directly to earth or land back on the moon. That iis also one of the reasons to have eleven (11) launch pads available prior to the main mission (also the eleven sites could be used for other space exploration missions prior to the Mars mission. Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Why not help out Sudan?????

Why not have a G38 and then a G55??? Right now (Sept. 2024) there is an economic and political forum made up of the world’s most advanced economies (the group of seven G7) and a G20 (the group of twenty). G7 are heads of state and government from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, and the United States (the European Union is also a non-enumerated member of the G7). G20 are heads of state and government from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, and the European Union. For the G38, the following countries could be added: Brazil, Spain, Netherlands, Switzerland, Poland, Sweden, Norway, Belgium, Cuba, Ireland, Israel, United Arab Emirates, Thailand, Nigeria, Egypt, Austria, Singapore, and Bangladesh. For the G55, the following countries could be added: Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines, Denmark, Iran, Pakistan, Hong Kong, Columbia, Romania, Chile, Czech, Finland, Iraq, Portugal, New Zealand, Peru, and Qatar. Now these countries could help out the country of Sudan, by providing cash payments, of say $51/month to 15 - 17 millions of Sudanese people, and also provide some food assistance in the amount of $51/month to 15 - 17 million people.for a cost of 14.688 billion. The share of the cost would be supplied as such: United States: $6,722,029,456 China: $4,739,220,360 Japan $979,711,365 Germany $942,906.839 India $783,810,326 United Kingdom $711,9007,059 France $644,378,703 Russia $518,764,457 Canada $495,475,361 Italy $465,510,759 Brazil $444,594,083 Australia $387,939,889 South Korea $385,585,065 Mexico $327,452,654 Spain $323,590,451 Indonesia $305,434,780 Saudi Arabia $256,589,747 Netherlands $252,980,866 Turkey $229,490,558 Switzerland $187,022,583 Poland $159,345,910 Argentina $145,860,401 Sweden $135,733,266 Norway $133,611,246 Belgium $133,392,702 Ireland $122,009,244 Israel $120,346,284 United Arab Emirates $117,518,356 Thailand $114,695,152 Nigeria $110,537,689 Egypt $110,389,980 Austria $109,151,656 Singapore $108,083,984 Bangladesh $106,558,558 Vietnam $94,657,217 Malaysia $94,079,291 South Africa $93,978,332 Philippines $93,611,094 Denmark $91,554,939 Iran $89,966,541 Pakistan $87,185,407 Hong Kong $83,319,943 Columbia $79,638,329 Romania $69,756,566 Chile $69,701,702 Czech $67,362,831 Finland $65,024,665 Iraq $61,170,768 Portugal $58,337,326 New Zealand $57,246,496 Peru $56,180,917 Qatar $54,945,391 Kazakhstan $51,084,774 Greece $50,724,256 Algeria $44,437,051 Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

We've got to relieve the Sudanese!!!!

Why not have a G38 and then a G55??? Right now (Sept. 2024) there is an economic and political forum made up of the world’s most advanced economies (the group of seven G7) and a G20 (the group of twenty). G7 are heads of state and government from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, and the United States (the European Union is also a non-enumerated member of the G7). G20 are heads of state and government from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, and the European Union. For the G38, the following countries could be added: Brazil, Spain, Netherlands, Switzerland, Poland, Sweden, Norway, Belgium, Cuba, Ireland, Israel, United Arab Emirates, Thailand, Nigeria, Egypt, Austria, Singapore, and Bangladesh. For the G55, the following countries could be added: Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines, Denmark, Iran, Pakistan, Hong Kong, Columbia, Romania, Chile, Czech, Finland, Iraq, Portugal, New Zealand, Peru, and Qatar. Now these countries could help out the country of Sudan, by providing cash payments, of say $51/month to 15 - 17 millions of Sudanese people, and also provide some food assistance in the amount of $51/month to 15 - 17 million people.for a cost of 14.688 billion. The share of the cost would be supplied as such: United States: $6,722,029,456 China: $4,739,220,360 Japan $979,711,365 Germany $942,906.839 India $783,810,326 United Kingdom $711,9007,059 France $644,378,703 Russia $518,764,457 Canada $495,475,361 Italy $465,510,759 Brazil $444,594,083 Australia $387,939,889 South Korea $385,585,065 Mexico $327,452,654 Spain $323,590,451 Indonesia $305,434,780 Saudi Arabia $256,589,747 Netherlands $252,980,866 Turkey $229,490,558 Switzerland $187,022,583 Poland $159,345,910 Argentina $145,860,401 Sweden $135,733,266 Norway $133,611,246 Belgium $133,392,702 Ireland $122,009,244 Israel $120,346,284 United Arab Emirates $117,518,356 Thailand $114,695,152 Nigeria $110,537,689 Egypt $110,389,980 Austria $109,151,656 Singapore $108,083,984 Bangladesh $106,558,558 Vietnam $94,657,217 Malaysia $94,079,291 South Africa $93,978,332 Philippines $93,611,094 Denmark $91,554,939 Iran $89,966,541 Pakistan $87,185,407 Hong Kong $83,319,943 Columbia $79,638,329 Romania $69,756,566 Chile $69,701,702 Czech $67,362,831 Finland $65,024,665 Iraq $61,170,768 Portugal $58,337,326 New Zealand $57,246,496 Peru $56,180,917 Qatar $54,945,391 Kazakhstan $51,084,774 Greece $50,724,256 Algeria $44,437,051 Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

A group of 38 (G38) and a group of 55 (G55)?????

Why not have a G38 and then a G55??? Right now (Sept. 2024) there is an economic and political forum made up of the world’s most advanced economies (the group of seven G7) and a G20 (the group of twenty). G7 are heads of state and government from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, and the United States (the European Union is also a non-enumerated member of the G7). G20 are heads of state and government from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, and the European Union. For the G38, the following countries could be added: Brazil, Spain, Netherlands, Switzerland, Poland, Sweden, Norway, Belgium, Cuba, Ireland, Israel, United Arab Emirates, Thailand, Nigeria, Egypt, Austria, Singapore, and Bangladesh. For the G55, the following countries could be added: Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines, Denmark, Iran, Pakistan, Hong Kong, Columbia, Romania, Chile, Czech, Finland, Iraq, Portugal, New Zealand, Peru, and Qatar. Now these countries could help out the country of Sudan, by providing cash payments, of say $51/month to 15 - 17 millions of Sudanese people, and also provide some food assistance in the amount of $51/month to 15 - 17 million people.for a cost of 14.688 billion. The share of the cost would be supplied as such: United States: $6,722,029,456 China: $4,739,220,360 Japan $979,711,365 Germany $942,906.839 India $783,810,326 United Kingdom $711,9007,059 France $644,378,703 Russia $518,764,457 Canada $495,475,361 Italy $465,510,759 Brazil $444,594,083 Australia $387,939,889 South Korea $385,585,065 Mexico $327,452,654 Spain $323,590,451 Indonesia $305,434,780 Saudi Arabia $256,589,747 Netherlands $252,980,866 Turkey $229,490,558 Switzerland $187,022,583 Poland $159,345,910 Argentina $145,860,401 Sweden $135,733,266 Norway $133,611,246 Belgium $133,392,702 Ireland $122,009,244 Israel $120,346,284 United Arab Emirates $117,518,356 Thailand $114,695,152 Nigeria $110,537,689 Egypt $110,389,980 Austria $109,151,656 Singapore $108,083,984 Bangladesh $106,558,558 Vietnam $94,657,217 Malaysia $94,079,291 South Africa $93,978,332 Philippines $93,611,094 Denmark $91,554,939 Iran $89,966,541 Pakistan $87,185,407 Hong Kong $83,319,943 Columbia $79,638,329 Romania $69,756,566 Chile $69,701,702 Czech $67,362,831 Finland $65,024,665 Iraq $61,170,768 Portugal $58,337,326 New Zealand $57,246,496 Peru $56,180,917 Qatar $54,945,391 Kazakhstan $51,084,774 Greece $50,724,256 Algeria $44,437,051 Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Please, please help create a group of 38 (G38) and a group of 55 (G55)!!!!

Why not have a G38 and then a G55??? Right now (Sept. 2024) there is an economic and political forum made up of the world’s most advanced economies (the group of seven G7) and a G20 (the group of twenty). G7 are heads of state and government from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, and the United States (the European Union is also a non-enumerated member of the G7). G20 are heads of state and government from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, and the European Union. For the G38, the following countries could be added: Brazil, Spain, Netherlands, Switzerland, Poland, Sweden, Norway, Belgium, Cuba, Ireland, Israel, United Arab Emirates, Thailand, Nigeria, Egypt, Austria, Singapore, and Bangladesh. For the G55, the following countries could be added: Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines, Denmark, Iran, Pakistan, Hong Kong, Columbia, Romania, Chile, Czech, Finland, Iraq, Portugal, New Zealand, Peru, and Qatar. Now these countries could help out the country of Sudan, by providing cash payments, of say $51/month to 15 - 17 millions of Sudanese people, and also provide some food assistance in the amount of $51/month to 15 - 17 million people.for a cost of 14.688 billion. The share of the cost would be supplied as such: United States: $6,722,029,456 China: $4,739,220,360 Japan $979,711,365 Germany $942,906.839 India $783,810,326 United Kingdom $711,9007,059 France $644,378,703 Russia $518,764,457 Canada $495,475,361 Italy $465,510,759 Brazil $444,594,083 Australia $387,939,889 South Korea $385,585,065 Mexico $327,452,654 Spain $323,590,451 Indonesia $305,434,780 Saudi Arabia $256,589,747 Netherlands $252,980,866 Turkey $229,490,558 Switzerland $187,022,583 Poland $159,345,910 Argentina $145,860,401 Sweden $135,733,266 Norway $133,611,246 Belgium $133,392,702 Ireland $122,009,244 Israel $120,346,284 United Arab Emirates $117,518,356 Thailand $114,695,152 Nigeria $110,537,689 Egypt $110,389,980 Austria $109,151,656 Singapore $108,083,984 Bangladesh $106,558,558 Vietnam $94,657,217 Malaysia $94,079,291 South Africa $93,978,332 Philippines $93,611,094 Denmark $91,554,939 Iran $89,966,541 Pakistan $87,185,407 Hong Kong $83,319,943 Columbia $79,638,329 Romania $69,756,566 Chile $69,701,702 Czech $67,362,831 Finland $65,024,665 Iraq $61,170,768 Portugal $58,337,326 New Zealand $57,246,496 Peru $56,180,917 Qatar $54,945,391 Kazakhstan $51,084,774 Greece $50,724,256 Algeria $44,437,051 Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Why not have a group of 38 (G38) and a group of 55 (G55)???

Why not have a G38 and then a G55??? Right now (Sept. 2024) there is an economic and political forum made up of the world’s most advanced economies (the group of seven G7) and a G20 (the group of twenty). G7 are heads of state and government from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, and the United States (the European Union is also a non-enumerated member of the G7). G20 are heads of state and government from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, and the European Union. For the G38, the following countries could be added: Brazil, Spain, Netherlands, Switzerland, Poland, Sweden, Norway, Belgium, Cuba, Ireland, Israel, United Arab Emirates, Thailand, Nigeria, Egypt, Austria, Singapore, and Bangladesh. For the G55, the following countries could be added: Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines, Denmark, Iran, Pakistan, Hong Kong, Columbia, Romania, Chile, Czech, Finland, Iraq, Portugal, New Zealand, Peru, and Qatar. Now these countries could help out the country of Sudan, by providing cash payments, of say $51/month to 15 - 17 millions of Sudanese people, and also provide some food assistance in the amount of $51/month to 15 - 17 million people.for a cost of 14.688 billion. The share of the cost would be supplied as such: United States: $6,722,029,456 China: $4,739,220,360 Japan $979,711,365 Germany $942,906.839 India $783,810,326 United Kingdom $711,9007,059 France $644,378,703 Russia $518,764,457 Canada $495,475,361 Italy $465,510,759 Brazil $444,594,083 Australia $387,939,889 South Korea $385,585,065 Mexico $327,452,654 Spain $323,590,451 Indonesia $305,434,780 Saudi Arabia $256,589,747 Netherlands $252,980,866 Turkey $229,490,558 Switzerland $187,022,583 Poland $159,345,910 Argentina $145,860,401 Sweden $135,733,266 Norway $133,611,246 Belgium $133,392,702 Ireland $122,009,244 Israel $120,346,284 United Arab Emirates $117,518,356 Thailand $114,695,152 Nigeria $110,537,689 Egypt $110,389,980 Austria $109,151,656 Singapore $108,083,984 Bangladesh $106,558,558 Vietnam $94,657,217 Malaysia $94,079,291 South Africa $93,978,332 Philippines $93,611,094 Denmark $91,554,939 Iran $89,966,541 Pakistan $87,185,407 Hong Kong $83,319,943 Columbia $79,638,329 Romania $69,756,566 Chile $69,701,702 Czech $67,362,831 Finland $65,024,665 Iraq $61,170,768 Portugal $58,337,326 New Zealand $57,246,496 Peru $56,180,917 Qatar $54,945,391 Kazakhstan $51,084,774 Greece $50,724,256 Algeria $44,437,051 Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Israel has a right to defeat Hamas and Hezbollah!!!

U.S. Congressman Josh Gottheimer 12/2/24 93 Spring St. suite 408 Newton, NJ 07860 Dear Congressman Josh Gottheimer, Greetings on this wonderful day. Hope you and the loved ones are in good health and are getting along. I am writing to you to encourage you to help bless Israel and help defeat Hamas. Also, I would like to encourage you to help inform the public more about Hamas and our ally Israel. Let’s quit with the equivocations: Please explain to the public that: Hamas has cursed Israel. The United States has blessed Israel in the past, and should continue to bless Israel. As Christians, we should state that GOD Almighty, our Creator LORD, had given Israel land (promised to Abraham by GOD) in the Middle East, and Israelis should be allowed to live there in peace. Scriptures state that whoever blesses Israel will be blessed, and whoever curses Israel will be cursed. See Numbers 24:9b and Gen 12:3 Israel has existed for years prior to 1948. The land Israel now occupies is only a fraction of what GOD promised them. GOD has given HIS Word that the nation of Israel will never cease as long as the sun still shines by day and the moon and stars shine by night Jeremiah 31:35-37 Israel has a right to defend herself. Israel has a right to defeat Hamas and Hezbollah!!! There are others in this world besides Hamas that hate Israel, and some have called for the destruction of Israel. Israel does not intentionally kill innocent people. Thank you very much for all your help! Hope that you and the loved ones have a joyous and peaceful day! May the good LORD, our Creator LORD, maker of the heavens and the earth bless you greatly! In hope, peace, and love, Ken Miller kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

U.S. Congressman Josh Gottheimer - please, please help tell the public more about our ally Israel!!!

U.S. Congressman Josh Gottheimer 12/2/24 93 Spring St. suite 408 Newton, NJ 07860 Dear Congressman Josh Gottheimer, Greetings on this wonderful day. Hope you and the loved ones are in good health and are getting along. I am writing to you to encourage you to help bless Israel and help defeat Hamas. Also, I would like to encourage you to help inform the public more about Hamas and our ally Israel. Let’s quit with the equivocations: Please explain to the public that: Hamas has cursed Israel. The United States has blessed Israel in the past, and should continue to bless Israel. As Christians, we should state that GOD Almighty, our Creator LORD, had given Israel land (promised to Abraham by GOD) in the Middle East, and Israelis should be allowed to live there in peace. Scriptures state that whoever blesses Israel will be blessed, and whoever curses Israel will be cursed. See Numbers 24:9b and Gen 12:3 Israel has existed for years prior to 1948. The land Israel now occupies is only a fraction of what GOD promised them. GOD has given HIS Word that the nation of Israel will never cease as long as the sun still shines by day and the moon and stars shine by night Jeremiah 31:35-37 Israel has a right to defend herself. Israel has a right to defeat Hamas and Hezbollah!!! There are others in this world besides Hamas that hate Israel, and some have called for the destruction of Israel. Israel does not intentionally kill innocent people. Thank you very much for all your help! Hope that you and the loved ones have a joyous and peaceful day! May the good LORD, our Creator LORD, maker of the heavens and the earth bless you greatly! In hope, peace, and love, Ken Miller kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Why not tell the public more about our ally Israel????

U.S. Congressman Josh Gottheimer 12/2/24 93 Spring St. suite 408 Newton, NJ 07860 Dear Congressman Josh Gottheimer, Greetings on this wonderful day. Hope you and the loved ones are in good health and are getting along. I am writing to you to encourage you to help bless Israel and help defeat Hamas. Also, I would like to encourage you to help inform the public more about Hamas and our ally Israel. Let’s quit with the equivocations: Please explain to the public that: Hamas has cursed Israel. The United States has blessed Israel in the past, and should continue to bless Israel. As Christians, we should state that GOD Almighty, our Creator LORD, had given Israel land (promised to Abraham by GOD) in the Middle East, and Israelis should be allowed to live there in peace. Scriptures state that whoever blesses Israel will be blessed, and whoever curses Israel will be cursed. See Numbers 24:9b and Gen 12:3 Israel has existed for years prior to 1948. The land Israel now occupies is only a fraction of what GOD promised them. GOD has given HIS Word that the nation of Israel will never cease as long as the sun still shines by day and the moon and stars shine by night Jeremiah 31:35-37 Israel has a right to defend herself. Israel has a right to defeat Hamas and Hezbollah!!! There are others in this world besides Hamas that hate Israel, and some have called for the destruction of Israel. Israel does not intentionally kill innocent people. Thank you very much for all your help! Hope that you and the loved ones have a joyous and peaceful day! May the good LORD, our Creator LORD, maker of the heavens and the earth bless you greatly! In hope, peace, and love, Ken Miller kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Please, please help tel the public more about Israel - our ally!!!!

U.S. Congressman Josh Gottheimer 12/2/24 93 Spring St. suite 408 Newton, NJ 07860 Dear Congressman Josh Gottheimer, Greetings on this wonderful day. Hope you and the loved ones are in good health and are getting along. I am writing to you to encourage you to help bless Israel and help defeat Hamas. Also, I would like to encourage you to help inform the public more about Hamas and our ally Israel. Let’s quit with the equivocations: Please explain to the public that: Hamas has cursed Israel. The United States has blessed Israel in the past, and should continue to bless Israel. As Christians, we should state that GOD Almighty, our Creator LORD, had given Israel land (promised to Abraham by GOD) in the Middle East, and Israelis should be allowed to live there in peace. Scriptures state that whoever blesses Israel will be blessed, and whoever curses Israel will be cursed. See Numbers 24:9b and Gen 12:3 Israel has existed for years prior to 1948. The land Israel now occupies is only a fraction of what GOD promised them. GOD has given HIS Word that the nation of Israel will never cease as long as the sun still shines by day and the moon and stars shine by night Jeremiah 31:35-37 Israel has a right to defend herself. Israel has a right to defeat Hamas and Hezbollah!!! There are others in this world besides Hamas that hate Israel, and some have called for the destruction of Israel. Israel does not intentionally kill innocent people. Thank you very much for all your help! Hope that you and the loved ones have a joyous and peaceful day! May the good LORD, our Creator LORD, maker of the heavens and the earth bless you greatly! In hope, peace, and love, Ken Miller kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Why not a moon station by 2032???

A Moon Station by 2032??? Now is the time to plan to build a moon space station to be occupied by scientists and paying visitors. This could be paid for by a group of 47 nations and private investors (maybe the top 20 billionaires). The project could run about $77.7 billion and be finished by 2032. The station could be equipped for 58 scientists and also house 230 travelers (vacationers). Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Please, please help build a moon station by 2032!!!!

A Moon Station by 2032??? Now is the time to plan to build a moon space station to be occupied by scientists and paying visitors. This could be paid for by a group of 47 nations and private investors (maybe the top 20 billionaires). The project could run about $77.7 billion and be finished by 2032. The station could be equipped for 58 scientists and also house 230 travelers (vacationers). Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

A Moon Station by 2032???

A Moon Station by 2032??? Now is the time to plan to build a moon space station to be occupied by scientists and paying visitors. This could be paid for by a group of 47 nations and private investors (maybe the top 20 billionaires). The project could run about $77.7 billion and be finished by 2032. The station could be equipped for 58 scientists and also house 230 travelers (vacationers). Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Please, please help modify the Corporate Tax Rate!!!!

Modify the Corporate Tax Rates Why not modify the Corporate Tax Rates? Why not have a rate that increases with the more a company makes in profits? The current corporate tax rate is 21 %. Company’s Profit Tax + ____ % over $0 - $3.5 million $0 13.125 $0 $3.5 million - $15.5 million $459,375 17 $3.5 million $15.5 million - $65.5 million $2,499,375 22.25 $15.5 million Over 65.5 million $13,624375 29 $65.5 million Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Why not modify the Corporate Tax Rates???

Modify the Corporate Tax Rates Why not modify the Corporate Tax Rates? Why not have a rate that increases with the more a company makes in profits? The current corporate tax rate is 21 %. Company’s Profit Tax + ____ % over $0 - $3.5 million $0 13.125 $0 $3.5 million - $15.5 million $459,375 17 $3.5 million $15.5 million - $65.5 million $2,499,375 22.25 $15.5 million Over 65.5 million $13,624375 29 $65.5 million Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

States such as California, Texas and Florida have lost out when the United States has increased in population over the years and yet the size of the House of Representatives remained the same size!!!

Why not increase the size of The House of Representatives? State Total A Total B Total C California 67 70 72 Texas 53 55 57 Florida 39 41 42 New York 34 35 36 Pennsylvania 22 23 24 Illinois 22 22 23 Ohio 20 21 22 Georgia 19 19 20 North Carolina 19 19 20 Michigan 17 18 19 New Jersey 16 17 17 Virginia 15 16 16 Washington 13 14 14 Arizona 13 13 14 Tennessee 12 13 13 Massachusetts 12 13 13 Indiana 12 12 13 Missouri 11 11 11 Maryland 11 11 11 Wisconsin 10 11 11 Colorado 10 11 11 Minnesota 10 10 11 South Carolina 9 10 10 Alabama 9 9 9 Louisiana 8 8 8 Kentucky 8 8 8 Oregon 7 8 8 Oklahoma 7 7 8 Connecticut 6 6 7 Utah 6 6 6 Iowa 6 6 6 Nevada 6 6 6 Arkansas 5 5 6 Kansas 5 5 5 Mississippi 5 5 5 New Mexico 3 4 4 Nebraska 3 4 4 Idaho 3 4 4 West Virginia 3 3 3 Hawaii 2 3 3 New hampshire 2 3 3 Maine 2 2 3 Montana 2 2 2 Rhode Island 2 2 2 Delaware 2 2 2 South Dakota 2 2 2 North Dakota 1 1 1 Alaska 1 1 1 Vermont 1 1 1 Wyoming 1 1 1 574 584 618 Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbykjen, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Increase the size of the House of Representatives???

Why not increase the size of The House of Representatives? State Total A Total B Total C California 67 70 72 Texas 53 55 57 Florida 39 41 42 New York 34 35 36 Pennsylvania 22 23 24 Illinois 22 22 23 Ohio 20 21 22 Georgia 19 19 20 North Carolina 19 19 20 Michigan 17 18 19 New Jersey 16 17 17 Virginia 15 16 16 Washington 13 14 14 Arizona 13 13 14 Tennessee 12 13 13 Massachusetts 12 13 13 Indiana 12 12 13 Missouri 11 11 11 Maryland 11 11 11 Wisconsin 10 11 11 Colorado 10 11 11 Minnesota 10 10 11 South Carolina 9 10 10 Alabama 9 9 9 Louisiana 8 8 8 Kentucky 8 8 8 Oregon 7 8 8 Oklahoma 7 7 8 Connecticut 6 6 7 Utah 6 6 6 Iowa 6 6 6 Nevada 6 6 6 Arkansas 5 5 6 Kansas 5 5 5 Mississippi 5 5 5 New Mexico 3 4 4 Nebraska 3 4 4 Idaho 3 4 4 West Virginia 3 3 3 Hawaii 2 3 3 New hampshire 2 3 3 Maine 2 2 3 Montana 2 2 2 Rhode Island 2 2 2 Delaware 2 2 2 South Dakota 2 2 2 North Dakota 1 1 1 Alaska 1 1 1 Vermont 1 1 1 Wyoming 1 1 1 574 584 618 Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbykjen, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Please, please help increase the size of The House of Representatives!!!!

Why not increase the size of The House of Representatives? State Total A Total B Total C California 67 70 72 Texas 53 55 57 Florida 39 41 42 New York 34 35 36 Pennsylvania 22 23 24 Illinois 22 22 23 Ohio 20 21 22 Georgia 19 19 20 North Carolina 19 19 20 Michigan 17 18 19 New Jersey 16 17 17 Virginia 15 16 16 Washington 13 14 14 Arizona 13 13 14 Tennessee 12 13 13 Massachusetts 12 13 13 Indiana 12 12 13 Missouri 11 11 11 Maryland 11 11 11 Wisconsin 10 11 11 Colorado 10 11 11 Minnesota 10 10 11 South Carolina 9 10 10 Alabama 9 9 9 Louisiana 8 8 8 Kentucky 8 8 8 Oregon 7 8 8 Oklahoma 7 7 8 Connecticut 6 6 7 Utah 6 6 6 Iowa 6 6 6 Nevada 6 6 6 Arkansas 5 5 6 Kansas 5 5 5 Mississippi 5 5 5 New Mexico 3 4 4 Nebraska 3 4 4 Idaho 3 4 4 West Virginia 3 3 3 Hawaii 2 3 3 New hampshire 2 3 3 Maine 2 2 3 Montana 2 2 2 Rhode Island 2 2 2 Delaware 2 2 2 South Dakota 2 2 2 North Dakota 1 1 1 Alaska 1 1 1 Vermont 1 1 1 Wyoming 1 1 1 574 584 618 Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbykjen, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Why not increase the size of The House of Representatives????

Why not increase the size of The House of Representatives? State Total A Total B Total C California 67 70 72 Texas 53 55 57 Florida 39 41 42 New York 34 35 36 Pennsylvania 22 23 24 Illinois 22 22 23 Ohio 20 21 22 Georgia 19 19 20 North Carolina 19 19 20 Michigan 17 18 19 New Jersey 16 17 17 Virginia 15 16 16 Washington 13 14 14 Arizona 13 13 14 Tennessee 12 13 13 Massachusetts 12 13 13 Indiana 12 12 13 Missouri 11 11 11 Maryland 11 11 11 Wisconsin 10 11 11 Colorado 10 11 11 Minnesota 10 10 11 South Carolina 9 10 10 Alabama 9 9 9 Louisiana 8 8 8 Kentucky 8 8 8 Oregon 7 8 8 Oklahoma 7 7 8 Connecticut 6 6 7 Utah 6 6 6 Iowa 6 6 6 Nevada 6 6 6 Arkansas 5 5 6 Kansas 5 5 5 Mississippi 5 5 5 New Mexico 3 4 4 Nebraska 3 4 4 Idaho 3 4 4 West Virginia 3 3 3 Hawaii 2 3 3 New hampshire 2 3 3 Maine 2 2 3 Montana 2 2 2 Rhode Island 2 2 2 Delaware 2 2 2 South Dakota 2 2 2 North Dakota 1 1 1 Alaska 1 1 1 Vermont 1 1 1 Wyoming 1 1 1 574 584 618 Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbykjen, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Six more Hubble Telescopes????

Why not launch six more Hubble Telescopes out into Space? Now is the time to consider building and then launching six more Hubble Telescopes into space over the next seven years. They could be set to go in different directions in the galaxy (as opposed to the current Hubble) and the information they’d provide would be beneficial to us all. Whereas the cost of the first Hubble Telescope has cost approximately $16 billion, there would be major cost savings for each successive Hubble Telescope built, learning from the experience of the first. Let’s move further into the galaxy and see what wonders our good LORD has created. We’d learn a tremendous amount from each successive mission! Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Please, please help build and launch six more Hubble Telescopes in the next seven years!!!!

Why not launch six more Hubble Telescopes out into Space? Now is the time to consider building and then launching six more Hubble Telescopes into space over the next seven years. They could be set to go in different directions in the galaxy (as opposed to the current Hubble) and the information they’d provide would be beneficial to us all. Whereas the cost of the first Hubble Telescope has cost approximately $16 billion, there would be major cost savings for each successive Hubble Telescope built, learning from the experience of the first. Let’s move further into the galaxy and see what wonders our good LORD has created. We’d learn a tremendous amount from each successive mission! Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Why not build and launch six more Hubble Telescope???

Why not launch six more Hubble Telescopes out into Space? Now is the time to consider building and then launching six more Hubble Telescopes into space over the next seven years. They could be set to go in different directions in the galaxy (as opposed to the current Hubble) and the information they’d provide would be beneficial to us all. Whereas the cost of the first Hubble Telescope has cost approximately $16 billion, there would be major cost savings for each successive Hubble Telescope built, learning from the experience of the first. Let’s move further into the galaxy and see what wonders our good LORD has created. We’d learn a tremendous amount from each successive mission! Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

An international nuclear oversight committee????

Why not create a Nuclear Oversight Committee??? Why not create an international body for nuclear oversight with the following nations? Consisting of Russia, England, France, India, Pakistan, China, Israel, Ukraine, South Africa, North Korea, Cuba, Japan, Iran, guest country A, and guest country B. The body could meet every three weeks and the guest countries would remain for 18 meetings, then the body would vote for two different countries to be guests. The number of delegates from each nation would be as such: Every other meeting the assembly would alternate in the number of delegates. # of Delegates Nation Member of Executive Council 9/10 Russia Yes 9/10 China Yes 6/ 7 England Yes 6/7 France Yes 9/10 United States Yes 6/7 India Yes 5/6 Pakistan Yes 5/6 Israel Yes 4/5 Ukraine No 3/3 South Africa No 3/3 Japan No 2/2 Cuba No 2/2 Iran No 2/2 North Korea No 2/2 guest country A No 2/2 guest country B No 3 of 8 countries on the Executive Council are needed to veto any proposals made by the assembly. 57.125 % of the assembly are needed to approve any proposals that would then go to the Executive council (43 or 48). Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Why not an international nuclear oversight committee???

Why not create a Nuclear Oversight Committee??? Why not create an international body for nuclear oversight with the following nations? Consisting of Russia, England, France, India, Pakistan, China, Israel, Ukraine, South Africa, North Korea, Cuba, Japan, Iran, guest country A, and guest country B. The body could meet every three weeks and the guest countries would remain for 18 meetings, then the body would vote for two different countries to be guests. The number of delegates from each nation would be as such: Every other meeting the assembly would alternate in the number of delegates. # of Delegates Nation Member of Executive Council 9/10 Russia Yes 9/10 China Yes 6/ 7 England Yes 6/7 France Yes 9/10 United States Yes 6/7 India Yes 5/6 Pakistan Yes 5/6 Israel Yes 4/5 Ukraine No 3/3 South Africa No 3/3 Japan No 2/2 Cuba No 2/2 Iran No 2/2 North Korea No 2/2 guest country A No 2/2 guest country B No 3 of 8 countries on the Executive Council are needed to veto any proposals made by the assembly. 57.125 % of the assembly are needed to approve any proposals that would then go to the Executive council (43 or 48). Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Please, please help prevent nuclear proliferation!!!

Why not create a Nuclear Oversight Committee??? Why not create an international body for nuclear oversight with the following nations? Consisting of Russia, England, France, India, Pakistan, China, Israel, Ukraine, South Africa, North Korea, Cuba, Japan, Iran, guest country A, and guest country B. The body could meet every three weeks and the guest countries would remain for 18 meetings, then the body would vote for two different countries to be guests. The number of delegates from each nation would be as such: Every other meeting the assembly would alternate in the number of delegates. # of Delegates Nation Member of Executive Council 9/10 Russia Yes 9/10 China Yes 6/ 7 England Yes 6/7 France Yes 9/10 United States Yes 6/7 India Yes 5/6 Pakistan Yes 5/6 Israel Yes 4/5 Ukraine No 3/3 South Africa No 3/3 Japan No 2/2 Cuba No 2/2 Iran No 2/2 North Korea No 2/2 guest country A No 2/2 guest country B No 3 of 8 countries on the Executive Council are needed to veto any proposals made by the assembly. 57.125 % of the assembly are needed to approve any proposals that would then go to the Executive council (43 or 48). Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Please, please help create an international nuclear oversight committee!!!

Why not create a Nuclear Oversight Committee??? Why not create an international body for nuclear oversight with the following nations? Consisting of Russia, England, France, India, Pakistan, China, Israel, Ukraine, South Africa, North Korea, Cuba, Japan, Iran, guest country A, and guest country B. The body could meet every three weeks and the guest countries would remain for 18 meetings, then the body would vote for two different countries to be guests. The number of delegates from each nation would be as such: Every other meeting the assembly would alternate in the number of delegates. # of Delegates Nation Member of Executive Council 9/10 Russia Yes 9/10 China Yes 6/ 7 England Yes 6/7 France Yes 9/10 United States Yes 6/7 India Yes 5/6 Pakistan Yes 5/6 Israel Yes 4/5 Ukraine No 3/3 South Africa No 3/3 Japan No 2/2 Cuba No 2/2 Iran No 2/2 North Korea No 2/2 guest country A No 2/2 guest country B No 3 of 8 countries on the Executive Council are needed to veto any proposals made by the assembly. 57.125 % of the assembly are needed to approve any proposals that would then go to the Executive council (43 or 48). Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Safer vehicles make for better vehicles and will save tens of thousands of lives!!!

Ford Motor Co. 12/2/24 Attn. Mr. James D. Farley Jr., CEO 1 American Rd. Dearborn, MI 48126 Dear Mr. James Farley, Jr., Greetings on this glorious day. I hope that you and the loved ones are well. I am writing to you for help. I would like those at General Motors to consider designing and making safer vehicles - because safer vehicles make for better vehicles. Not that GM hasn’t tried to make safer vehicles, but some additional use of technology could go a long way to improving the safety of vehicles - both for those inside the vehicle and those outside the vehicle. Please consider having the design of vehicles use the advances in technology to do the following: Safer vehicles make better vehicles With technology being more advanced in 2024 than 40 years ago, now is the time to push for safer made vehicles. This could be accomplished in three years. Some of the improvements should be: Make the vehicles unable to start if the driver is impaired by marijuana, alcohol, or other drugs Start to require all new vehicles to have back-up cameras. Start to require all new vehicles to have front positioned cameras. Start to require all new vehicles to have sensors on all sides of the vehicle Remember: safer vehicles make for better vehicles. These four improvements could save tens of thousands of lives and who knows how many dollars in a year. Thank you very much for all your help! Hope that you and the loved ones have a joyous and peaceful day! May the good LORD, our Creator LORD, maker of the heavens and the earth, bless you and the loved ones immensely! In hope, peace, and love, Ken Miller kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Why not have safer vehicles???

Ford Motor Co. 12/2/24 Attn. Mr. James D. Farley Jr., CEO 1 American Rd. Dearborn, MI 48126 Dear Mr. James Farley, Jr., Greetings on this glorious day. I hope that you and the loved ones are well. I am writing to you for help. I would like those at General Motors to consider designing and making safer vehicles - because safer vehicles make for better vehicles. Not that GM hasn’t tried to make safer vehicles, but some additional use of technology could go a long way to improving the safety of vehicles - both for those inside the vehicle and those outside the vehicle. Please consider having the design of vehicles use the advances in technology to do the following: Safer vehicles make better vehicles With technology being more advanced in 2024 than 40 years ago, now is the time to push for safer made vehicles. This could be accomplished in three years. Some of the improvements should be: Make the vehicles unable to start if the driver is impaired by marijuana, alcohol, or other drugs Start to require all new vehicles to have back-up cameras. Start to require all new vehicles to have front positioned cameras. Start to require all new vehicles to have sensors on all sides of the vehicle Remember: safer vehicles make for better vehicles. These four improvements could save tens of thousands of lives and who knows how many dollars in a year. Thank you very much for all your help! Hope that you and the loved ones have a joyous and peaceful day! May the good LORD, our Creator LORD, maker of the heavens and the earth, bless you and the loved ones immensely! In hope, peace, and love, Ken Miller kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Dear, dear Mr. James Farley - please, please get Ford Motor Co. to manufacture safer vehicles!!!!

Ford Motor Co. 12/2/24 Attn. Mr. James D. Farley Jr., CEO 1 American Rd. Dearborn, MI 48126 Dear Mr. James Farley, Jr., Greetings on this glorious day. I hope that you and the loved ones are well. I am writing to you for help. I would like those at General Motors to consider designing and making safer vehicles - because safer vehicles make for better vehicles. Not that GM hasn’t tried to make safer vehicles, but some additional use of technology could go a long way to improving the safety of vehicles - both for those inside the vehicle and those outside the vehicle. Please consider having the design of vehicles use the advances in technology to do the following: Safer vehicles make better vehicles With technology being more advanced in 2024 than 40 years ago, now is the time to push for safer made vehicles. This could be accomplished in three years. Some of the improvements should be: Make the vehicles unable to start if the driver is impaired by marijuana, alcohol, or other drugs Start to require all new vehicles to have back-up cameras. Start to require all new vehicles to have front positioned cameras. Start to require all new vehicles to have sensors on all sides of the vehicle Remember: safer vehicles make for better vehicles. These four improvements could save tens of thousands of lives and who knows how many dollars in a year. Thank you very much for all your help! Hope that you and the loved ones have a joyous and peaceful day! May the good LORD, our Creator LORD, maker of the heavens and the earth, bless you and the loved ones immensely! In hope, peace, and love, Ken Miller kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Please, please help get auto manufacturers to make safer vehicles.

Ford Motor Co. 12/2/24 Attn. Mr. James D. Farley Jr., CEO 1 American Rd. Dearborn, MI 48126 Dear Mr. James Farley, Jr., Greetings on this glorious day. I hope that you and the loved ones are well. I am writing to you for help. I would like those at General Motors to consider designing and making safer vehicles - because safer vehicles make for better vehicles. Not that GM hasn’t tried to make safer vehicles, but some additional use of technology could go a long way to improving the safety of vehicles - both for those inside the vehicle and those outside the vehicle. Please consider having the design of vehicles use the advances in technology to do the following: Safer vehicles make better vehicles With technology being more advanced in 2024 than 40 years ago, now is the time to push for safer made vehicles. This could be accomplished in three years. Some of the improvements should be: Make the vehicles unable to start if the driver is impaired by marijuana, alcohol, or other drugs Start to require all new vehicles to have back-up cameras. Start to require all new vehicles to have front positioned cameras. Start to require all new vehicles to have sensors on all sides of the vehicle Remember: safer vehicles make for better vehicles. These four improvements could save tens of thousands of lives and who knows how many dollars in a year. Thank you very much for all your help! Hope that you and the loved ones have a joyous and peaceful day! May the good LORD, our Creator LORD, maker of the heavens and the earth, bless you and the loved ones immensely! In hope, peace, and love, Ken Miller kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Dear, dear U.S. Congressman Josh Gottheimer - please, please help improve the justice System!!!

U.S. Congressman Josh Gottheimer 12/2/24 93 Spring St. suite 408 Newton., NJ 07860 Dear Congressman Josh Gottheimer, Greetings on this glorious day. I hope that you and the loved ones are in good health and are getting along. I am writing to you on ways to improve the Justice System here in the United States. Here in the United States we should try to aim for where the not guilty accused of wrongdoing are found not guilty, as well as the guilty to be found guilty in the eyes of the Law. It does not have to be overemphasized that in the United States, in my lifetime - 68 years, this has not always been the case - not even close to it! So the following reforms should be instituted: Enact a 7 year moratorium on the use of the death penalty. Over the seven year moratorium period, if the following reforms were also instituted and other reforms throughout the country involving police departments were instituted, the Justice System would be greatly improved and confidence in the system by the public would be greatly increased (this shift would also instigate other reforms to improve the system). Increase the size of the Supreme Court to 12 members. Although the country has increased in size since the Supreme Court had last increased to 9 members (1869), the Court has remained at 9 members - meaning 5 members held the power of the Court over these years and years to come if the Court doesn’t increase in size. Create 2 new levels of courts within the Justice system: One level right below the Supreme Court, made up of 9 justices (maybe 9 created over a 6 year span). As first proposed by Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger in 1983, Burger said a dramatic restructuring is necessary to “avoid a breakdown of the system – or some of the justices.” This will allow the Supreme Court to spend more time on each case, and they wouldn’t have to review as many cases because the new level of Court would view cases, and so decrease the backlog of cases now in the system. The other level to take up appeals for those that have been accused of committing felonies (especially murder cases), and other high misdemeanors (maybe create 54 over a 7 year period) made up of 7 justices. This will allow more alleged criminals to appeal their cases - how many people wrongfully incarcerated have there been over the last 40 years (or over the last 60 years), or how many people cases have been delayed because of the backload of cases? Remember, justice delayed is justice denied. Right now the poor have but a public defender to help them in their case (or they may defend themselves) when accused of a crime. There aren’t enough great public defenders (plus there is a backload of cases) and their expertise, as opposed to the attorneys those defendants that are rich can afford (high priced attorneys with expertise in different aspects of Law) probably don’t compare. So let’s create a voucher payment system for the poor and/or working poor as follows (and the Miranda Warning would have to include the phrase “or a government voucher may be applied to your case”): For those accused of Felonies: A voucher worth up to $60,000 - $3,775,000. Monies could be used for the original case, and any and all subsequent appeals. For those accused of Misdemeanors: A voucher worth up to $15,000 - $1,337,500. For those accused of Disorderly Persons offenses: A voucher worth up to $5,500 - $425,000 Just think of how many innocent people would be found not guilty if they were given more resources (the voucher shown above) to help plead for their innocence, and to fight for their innocence. Also, if less innocent people get sent to prisons, there would be less cost to the taxpayers, although the vouchers themselves would be an added expense to the system (as would the new judges appointed in the two new levels of courts). Another reform that would improve the judicial system throughout the United States would be by making any term of judge in the States to be at least 11 years - so that campaigning would be less frequent and the cost to the system overall would be less. This reform would also encourage more States to increase the terms of judges, to provide more independence of the judiciary. There would probably be more calls for reform once, or even during, the making of the above reforms were instituted. The aim of the reforms should always be to provide a more perfect system where those not guilty should be found not guilty and those guilty should be found guilty. Thank you for all your help. Hope that you and the loved ones have a joyous and peaceful day. May the good LORD, our Creator LORD, bless you and the loved ones with love, joy, peace, and patience! In hope, peace, and love, Ken Miller kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Why not improve the justice System???

U.S. Congressman Josh Gottheimer 12/2/24 93 Spring St. suite 408 Newton., NJ 07860 Dear Congressman Josh Gottheimer, Greetings on this glorious day. I hope that you and the loved ones are in good health and are getting along. I am writing to you on ways to improve the Justice System here in the United States. Here in the United States we should try to aim for where the not guilty accused of wrongdoing are found not guilty, as well as the guilty to be found guilty in the eyes of the Law. It does not have to be overemphasized that in the United States, in my lifetime - 68 years, this has not always been the case - not even close to it! So the following reforms should be instituted: Enact a 7 year moratorium on the use of the death penalty. Over the seven year moratorium period, if the following reforms were also instituted and other reforms throughout the country involving police departments were instituted, the Justice System would be greatly improved and confidence in the system by the public would be greatly increased (this shift would also instigate other reforms to improve the system). Increase the size of the Supreme Court to 12 members. Although the country has increased in size since the Supreme Court had last increased to 9 members (1869), the Court has remained at 9 members - meaning 5 members held the power of the Court over these years and years to come if the Court doesn’t increase in size. Create 2 new levels of courts within the Justice system: One level right below the Supreme Court, made up of 9 justices (maybe 9 created over a 6 year span). As first proposed by Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger in 1983, Burger said a dramatic restructuring is necessary to “avoid a breakdown of the system – or some of the justices.” This will allow the Supreme Court to spend more time on each case, and they wouldn’t have to review as many cases because the new level of Court would view cases, and so decrease the backlog of cases now in the system. The other level to take up appeals for those that have been accused of committing felonies (especially murder cases), and other high misdemeanors (maybe create 54 over a 7 year period) made up of 7 justices. This will allow more alleged criminals to appeal their cases - how many people wrongfully incarcerated have there been over the last 40 years (or over the last 60 years), or how many people cases have been delayed because of the backload of cases? Remember, justice delayed is justice denied. Right now the poor have but a public defender to help them in their case (or they may defend themselves) when accused of a crime. There aren’t enough great public defenders (plus there is a backload of cases) and their expertise, as opposed to the attorneys those defendants that are rich can afford (high priced attorneys with expertise in different aspects of Law) probably don’t compare. So let’s create a voucher payment system for the poor and/or working poor as follows (and the Miranda Warning would have to include the phrase “or a government voucher may be applied to your case”): For those accused of Felonies: A voucher worth up to $60,000 - $3,775,000. Monies could be used for the original case, and any and all subsequent appeals. For those accused of Misdemeanors: A voucher worth up to $15,000 - $1,337,500. For those accused of Disorderly Persons offenses: A voucher worth up to $5,500 - $425,000 Just think of how many innocent people would be found not guilty if they were given more resources (the voucher shown above) to help plead for their innocence, and to fight for their innocence. Also, if less innocent people get sent to prisons, there would be less cost to the taxpayers, although the vouchers themselves would be an added expense to the system (as would the new judges appointed in the two new levels of courts). Another reform that would improve the judicial system throughout the United States would be by making any term of judge in the States to be at least 11 years - so that campaigning would be less frequent and the cost to the system overall would be less. This reform would also encourage more States to increase the terms of judges, to provide more independence of the judiciary. There would probably be more calls for reform once, or even during, the making of the above reforms were instituted. The aim of the reforms should always be to provide a more perfect system where those not guilty should be found not guilty and those guilty should be found guilty. Thank you for all your help. Hope that you and the loved ones have a joyous and peaceful day. May the good LORD, our Creator LORD, bless you and the loved ones with love, joy, peace, and patience! In hope, peace, and love, Ken Miller kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Please, please help improve the Justice System!!!

U.S. Congressman Josh Gottheimer 12/2/24 93 Spring St. suite 408 Newton., NJ 07860 Dear Congressman Josh Gottheimer, Greetings on this glorious day. I hope that you and the loved ones are in good health and are getting along. I am writing to you on ways to improve the Justice System here in the United States. Here in the United States we should try to aim for where the not guilty accused of wrongdoing are found not guilty, as well as the guilty to be found guilty in the eyes of the Law. It does not have to be overemphasized that in the United States, in my lifetime - 68 years, this has not always been the case - not even close to it! So the following reforms should be instituted: Enact a 7 year moratorium on the use of the death penalty. Over the seven year moratorium period, if the following reforms were also instituted and other reforms throughout the country involving police departments were instituted, the Justice System would be greatly improved and confidence in the system by the public would be greatly increased (this shift would also instigate other reforms to improve the system). Increase the size of the Supreme Court to 12 members. Although the country has increased in size since the Supreme Court had last increased to 9 members (1869), the Court has remained at 9 members - meaning 5 members held the power of the Court over these years and years to come if the Court doesn’t increase in size. Create 2 new levels of courts within the Justice system: One level right below the Supreme Court, made up of 9 justices (maybe 9 created over a 6 year span). As first proposed by Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger in 1983, Burger said a dramatic restructuring is necessary to “avoid a breakdown of the system – or some of the justices.” This will allow the Supreme Court to spend more time on each case, and they wouldn’t have to review as many cases because the new level of Court would view cases, and so decrease the backlog of cases now in the system. The other level to take up appeals for those that have been accused of committing felonies (especially murder cases), and other high misdemeanors (maybe create 54 over a 7 year period) made up of 7 justices. This will allow more alleged criminals to appeal their cases - how many people wrongfully incarcerated have there been over the last 40 years (or over the last 60 years), or how many people cases have been delayed because of the backload of cases? Remember, justice delayed is justice denied. Right now the poor have but a public defender to help them in their case (or they may defend themselves) when accused of a crime. There aren’t enough great public defenders (plus there is a backload of cases) and their expertise, as opposed to the attorneys those defendants that are rich can afford (high priced attorneys with expertise in different aspects of Law) probably don’t compare. So let’s create a voucher payment system for the poor and/or working poor as follows (and the Miranda Warning would have to include the phrase “or a government voucher may be applied to your case”): For those accused of Felonies: A voucher worth up to $60,000 - $3,775,000. Monies could be used for the original case, and any and all subsequent appeals. For those accused of Misdemeanors: A voucher worth up to $15,000 - $1,337,500. For those accused of Disorderly Persons offenses: A voucher worth up to $5,500 - $425,000 Just think of how many innocent people would be found not guilty if they were given more resources (the voucher shown above) to help plead for their innocence, and to fight for their innocence. Also, if less innocent people get sent to prisons, there would be less cost to the taxpayers, although the vouchers themselves would be an added expense to the system (as would the new judges appointed in the two new levels of courts). Another reform that would improve the judicial system throughout the United States would be by making any term of judge in the States to be at least 11 years - so that campaigning would be less frequent and the cost to the system overall would be less. This reform would also encourage more States to increase the terms of judges, to provide more independence of the judiciary. There would probably be more calls for reform once, or even during, the making of the above reforms were instituted. The aim of the reforms should always be to provide a more perfect system where those not guilty should be found not guilty and those guilty should be found guilty. Thank you for all your help. Hope that you and the loved ones have a joyous and peaceful day. May the good LORD, our Creator LORD, bless you and the loved ones with love, joy, peace, and patience! In hope, peace, and love, Ken Miller kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.

Why not give just restoration payments to descendants of Slaves and to Native Americans????

Modified Just Restoration Payments to descendants of Slaves and to Native Americans For nine straight years a lottery would be held, eight times a week normally, but on every 4th week another number is drawn. Each of these nine years a $3,873 tax credit will be allowed to descendants of Slaves and to Native Americans. 430 drawings would be drawn each year with an additional drawing made every third year of the program, for a total of 3,873 drawings over the nine year period (3,215 would be for descendants of Slaves and 658 would be for Native Americans). Below is a list of the money given at random during the year. $116.35 billion 21. $2.01 billion 41. $23.45 million $92.3557 billion 22. $1.6554 billion 42. $19.313 million $78.3984 billion 23. $1.32432 billion 43. $15.1745 million $66.4661 billion 24. $1.059456 billion 44. $13.795 million $61.256 billion 25. $847.013 million 45. $13.795 million 43.6106 billion 26. $677.3345 million 46. $13.795 million $37.5193 billion 27. $542.1435 million 47. $13.795 million $37.1320 billion 28. $433.163 million 48. $13.795 million $24.738 billion 29. $346.2545 million 49. $13.795 million $20.615 billion 30. $277.2795 million 50. $13.795 million $19.1425 billion 31. $222.0995 million 51. $13.795 million $17.670 billion 32. $176.576 million 52. $13.795 million $12.369 billion 33. $142.0835 million 53. $13.795 million $11.4855 billion 34. $113.119 million 54. $13.795 million $10.602 billion 35. $91.047 million 55. $13.795 million $7.068 billion 36. $73.1135 million 56. $13.795 million $5.301 billion 37. $57.939 million 57. $13.795 million $4.123 billion 38. $46.903 million 58. $13.795 million $3.8285 billion 39. $37.2465 million 59. $13.795 million $2.356 billion 40. $28.9695 million 60. $13.795 million $672.3866 billion $10.67331045 billion $292.4525 million Lottery winners from numbers 61 - 430 also would receive $13.795 million each. Total cost of Just Restoration Payments would be around $683.3523629 billion + $5.10415 billion + $100 billion + three additional drawings of say $34.16761815 billion = $822.624131 billion/year, for a total cost over the nine years of approximately $ 7.412617179 trillion. Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyke@gmail.com.

It is long overdue and it would be the right thing to do.

Modified Just Restoration Payments to descendants of Slaves and to Native Americans For nine straight years a lottery would be held, eight times a week normally, but on every 4th week another number is drawn. Each of these nine years a $3,873 tax credit will be allowed to descendants of Slaves and to Native Americans. 430 drawings would be drawn each year with an additional drawing made every third year of the program, for a total of 3,873 drawings over the nine year period (3,215 would be for descendants of Slaves and 658 would be for Native Americans). Below is a list of the money given at random during the year. $116.35 billion 21. $2.01 billion 41. $23.45 million $92.3557 billion 22. $1.6554 billion 42. $19.313 million $78.3984 billion 23. $1.32432 billion 43. $15.1745 million $66.4661 billion 24. $1.059456 billion 44. $13.795 million $61.256 billion 25. $847.013 million 45. $13.795 million 43.6106 billion 26. $677.3345 million 46. $13.795 million $37.5193 billion 27. $542.1435 million 47. $13.795 million $37.1320 billion 28. $433.163 million 48. $13.795 million $24.738 billion 29. $346.2545 million 49. $13.795 million $20.615 billion 30. $277.2795 million 50. $13.795 million $19.1425 billion 31. $222.0995 million 51. $13.795 million $17.670 billion 32. $176.576 million 52. $13.795 million $12.369 billion 33. $142.0835 million 53. $13.795 million $11.4855 billion 34. $113.119 million 54. $13.795 million $10.602 billion 35. $91.047 million 55. $13.795 million $7.068 billion 36. $73.1135 million 56. $13.795 million $5.301 billion 37. $57.939 million 57. $13.795 million $4.123 billion 38. $46.903 million 58. $13.795 million $3.8285 billion 39. $37.2465 million 59. $13.795 million $2.356 billion 40. $28.9695 million 60. $13.795 million $672.3866 billion $10.67331045 billion $292.4525 million Lottery winners from numbers 61 - 430 also would receive $13.795 million each. Total cost of Just Restoration Payments would be around $683.3523629 billion + $5.10415 billion + $100 billion + three additional drawings of say $34.16761815 billion = $822.624131 billion/year, for a total cost over the nine years of approximately $ 7.412617179 trillion. Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyke@gmail.com.

Just Restoration Payments for descendants of Slaves and to Native Americans???

Modified Just Restoration Payments to descendants of Slaves and to Native Americans For nine straight years a lottery would be held, eight times a week normally, but on every 4th week another number is drawn. Each of these nine years a $3,873 tax credit will be allowed to descendants of Slaves and to Native Americans. 430 drawings would be drawn each year with an additional drawing made every third year of the program, for a total of 3,873 drawings over the nine year period (3,215 would be for descendants of Slaves and 658 would be for Native Americans). Below is a list of the money given at random during the year. $116.35 billion 21. $2.01 billion 41. $23.45 million $92.3557 billion 22. $1.6554 billion 42. $19.313 million $78.3984 billion 23. $1.32432 billion 43. $15.1745 million $66.4661 billion 24. $1.059456 billion 44. $13.795 million $61.256 billion 25. $847.013 million 45. $13.795 million 43.6106 billion 26. $677.3345 million 46. $13.795 million $37.5193 billion 27. $542.1435 million 47. $13.795 million $37.1320 billion 28. $433.163 million 48. $13.795 million $24.738 billion 29. $346.2545 million 49. $13.795 million $20.615 billion 30. $277.2795 million 50. $13.795 million $19.1425 billion 31. $222.0995 million 51. $13.795 million $17.670 billion 32. $176.576 million 52. $13.795 million $12.369 billion 33. $142.0835 million 53. $13.795 million $11.4855 billion 34. $113.119 million 54. $13.795 million $10.602 billion 35. $91.047 million 55. $13.795 million $7.068 billion 36. $73.1135 million 56. $13.795 million $5.301 billion 37. $57.939 million 57. $13.795 million $4.123 billion 38. $46.903 million 58. $13.795 million $3.8285 billion 39. $37.2465 million 59. $13.795 million $2.356 billion 40. $28.9695 million 60. $13.795 million $672.3866 billion $10.67331045 billion $292.4525 million Lottery winners from numbers 61 - 430 also would receive $13.795 million each. Total cost of Just Restoration Payments would be around $683.3523629 billion + $5.10415 billion + $100 billion + three additional drawings of say $34.16761815 billion = $822.624131 billion/year, for a total cost over the nine years of approximately $ 7.412617179 trillion. Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyke@gmail.com.

Please, please help give land back to Native Americans and help give just restoration payments to descendants of Slaves and to native Americans!!!

Modified Just Restoration Payments to descendants of Slaves and to Native Americans For nine straight years a lottery would be held, eight times a week normally, but on every 4th week another number is drawn. Each of these nine years a $3,873 tax credit will be allowed to descendants of Slaves and to Native Americans. 430 drawings would be drawn each year with an additional drawing made every third year of the program, for a total of 3,873 drawings over the nine year period (3,215 would be for descendants of Slaves and 658 would be for Native Americans). Below is a list of the money given at random during the year. $116.35 billion 21. $2.01 billion 41. $23.45 million $92.3557 billion 22. $1.6554 billion 42. $19.313 million $78.3984 billion 23. $1.32432 billion 43. $15.1745 million $66.4661 billion 24. $1.059456 billion 44. $13.795 million $61.256 billion 25. $847.013 million 45. $13.795 million 43.6106 billion 26. $677.3345 million 46. $13.795 million $37.5193 billion 27. $542.1435 million 47. $13.795 million $37.1320 billion 28. $433.163 million 48. $13.795 million $24.738 billion 29. $346.2545 million 49. $13.795 million $20.615 billion 30. $277.2795 million 50. $13.795 million $19.1425 billion 31. $222.0995 million 51. $13.795 million $17.670 billion 32. $176.576 million 52. $13.795 million $12.369 billion 33. $142.0835 million 53. $13.795 million $11.4855 billion 34. $113.119 million 54. $13.795 million $10.602 billion 35. $91.047 million 55. $13.795 million $7.068 billion 36. $73.1135 million 56. $13.795 million $5.301 billion 37. $57.939 million 57. $13.795 million $4.123 billion 38. $46.903 million 58. $13.795 million $3.8285 billion 39. $37.2465 million 59. $13.795 million $2.356 billion 40. $28.9695 million 60. $13.795 million $672.3866 billion $10.67331045 billion $292.4525 million Lottery winners from numbers 61 - 430 also would receive $13.795 million each. Total cost of Just Restoration Payments would be around $683.3523629 billion + $5.10415 billion + $100 billion + three additional drawings of say $34.16761815 billion = $822.624131 billion/year, for a total cost over the nine years of approximately $ 7.412617179 trillion. Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyke@gmail.com.

Why not change social security for the better???

How about improving Social Security without cutting benefits or raising the Full Retirement Age??? It could be done!!! Social Security reform measures: How to preserve the social security system for the poor, middle class, and some of the rich. Should we regret separating the very rich from the social security system? First, tax (social security tax - 6.20 %) the rich on their incomes (now, in 2024 we only tax up to the first $ 168,600 of their incomes) Let’s say we tax (6.20%) as follows: Year Income 2025 $340,000 2026 $700,000 2027 $1,500,000 2028 $3,000,000 2029 $7,000,000 2030 $15,000,000 2031 $28,000,000 2032 and on $47,000,000 Second, let's stop paying out social security to the very rich and change (reduce) the payments that the rich were supposed to receive. Again let’s not regret these changes - let’s not feel sorry for the very rich. Let’s say we stop paying out social security to the very rich - those people that averaged $17,500,000 a year income over the last three years. So that three years from now, in 2027, the very rich would no longer receive any social security. Also, let’s reduce what rich people would have received from social security as such: Average income over the last three years Reduced social security payment $15,750,000 .375 $13,750,000 .50 $12,2250,000 .75 .885 Those averaging less than $8.5 million over the last three years of their work will receive what social security plans on giving them, and those making more will have their benefits reduced. Third, institute a net asset tax on the very rich and use the raised money to help preserve the Social Security System for the poor, middle class and some of the rich. A net asset tax could look like: Net Assets Tax + ___ % over $0 - $28,000,000 $0 .20 $0 $28,000,000 - $90,000,000 $56,000 .30 $28,000,000 $90,000,000 - $250,000,000 $242,000 .50 $90,000,000 $250,000,000 - $500,000,000 $1,042,000 1.00 $250.000.000 $500,000,000 - $1,000,000,000 $3,542,000 1.345 $500,000,000 $1,000,000,000 - $3,000,000,000 $10,267,000 1.803 $1,000,000,000 $3,000,000,000 - $6,000,000,000 $46,327,000 2.431 $3,000,000,000 Over $6,000,000,000 $119,257,000 3.25 $6,000,000,000 With allowable deductions of: Personal - $6,000,000 Spouse - $6,000,000 Child under 19 years of age - $2,4000,000 Forth, require more earned Social Security credits to be eligible to collect social security (currently in 2024 it’s 40) as such: Year Earned credits required 1 60 6 74 11 92 16 115 21 144 These are some measures to help preserve social security without having to cut benefits. Before deciding on cutting benefits, let’s put these measures into law and see if further actions are required to help preserve social security for the poor, middle class, and some of the rich. Please contact President Joe Biden at The White House, Wash. D.C. 20500, U.S. Congressman Josh Gottheimer, 93 Spring st. suite 408, Newton, NJ 07860, and U.S. Senator Cory Booker, One Gateway Center - 23rd fl., Newark, NJ 07101. Please, please see www.blogger.com ablogbyken, or write kmillerbloggerablogbyken@gmail.com.